What if the battery is broken? Repair it. What if it can’t be repaired? Replace it.
This approach, which sounds reasonable, may face the risk of violation in actual operation – if the original battery has been discontinued or the manufacturer has closed down, the model and even brand of the new battery replaced are inconsistent with the original announcement of the vehicle, which not only violates the subsidy policy for new energy vehicles, but also makes the consistency of the vehicle questionable.
For electric vehicle users, the car is not broken, but the battery is scrapped, which is already a big problem. It is even more difficult to replace the new battery through compliant channels. In the absence of law to follow, vehicle manufacturers and battery manufacturers may not dare to act on user needs, or tacitly operate in the gray area.
On the management side, how to regulate battery replacement and respond to corporate demands, the competent authorities also have many concerns, and it seems difficult to provide a set of solutions that satisfy all parties at the moment.
Given that the replacement and maintenance of automobile batteries has become a problem that is difficult to perfectly solve between car owners and vehicle manufacturers, in the era of the rise of new energy, whether it is electric vehicles, industrial and commercial energy storage, aviation, marine and other fields, purchasing branded batteries through formal channels is the only way to increase the value of their products.
